Cross-country
Comparative implementation burden
The same framework costs very different amounts — and lands very differently on public finances — depending on population, income level and existing maturity. Compare up to six states under identical scenario settings.
Total programme cost (US$M)
Cost per capita (US$)
Detail
Side-by-side
Per-capita cost and share of government expenditure are the two figures that determine whether a programme survives a budget cycle.
| Country | Total (US$M) | Range | Annual | Per capita | % gov. spend | AI-CSIRT | Feasibility | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States335M · high exposure | 783 | 522–1043 | 261 | $2.34 | 0.002% | 39–65 FTE | Strong | Report |
| Brazil216M · moderate exposure | 393 | 262–523 | 131 | $1.82 | 0.013% | 31–52 FTE | Strong | Report |
| Kenya55M · moderate exposure | 151 | 101–202 | 50 | $2.75 | 0.182% | 16–26 FTE | Moderate | Report |
| Indonesia278M · moderate exposure | 419 | 279–558 | 140 | $1.51 | 0.056% | 35–59 FTE | Moderate | Report |
United States
StrongAll four NADAC tiers are realistically deliverable on the specified timeline.
- Affordability
- Workforce availability
- Regulatory capacity
- Tier 1 readiness
- Tier 2–4 readiness
Brazil
StrongAll four NADAC tiers are realistically deliverable on the specified timeline.
- Affordability
- Workforce availability
- Regulatory capacity
- Tier 1 readiness
- Tier 2–4 readiness
Kenya
ModerateTiers 1 and 2 are deliverable; Tiers 3 and 4 will need phasing, coalition support, or an extended timeline.
- Affordability
- Workforce availability
- Regulatory capacity
- Tier 1 readiness
- Tier 2–4 readiness
Indonesia
ModerateTiers 1 and 2 are deliverable; Tiers 3 and 4 will need phasing, coalition support, or an extended timeline.
- Affordability
- Workforce availability
- Regulatory capacity
- Tier 1 readiness
- Tier 2–4 readiness